Toward Hardware-Agnostic Quadrupedal World Models via Morphology Conditioning
Mohamad H. Danesh, Chenhao Li, Amin Abyaneh, Anas Houssaini, Kirsty Ellis, Glen Berseth, Marco Hutter, Hsiu-Chin Lin

TL;DR
This paper introduces a morphology-conditioned quadrupedal world model that generalizes across different robot embodiments, enabling zero-shot locomotion control without retraining for each new morphology.
Contribution
It proposes a novel framework that explicitly conditions the dynamics model on robot morphology, allowing zero-shot generalization across different quadrupedal robots.
Findings
The model can generalize to new morphologies within the same family without retraining.
Explicit morphology conditioning improves zero-shot adaptation compared to implicit methods.
The approach enables safe and efficient locomotion control across varied robot embodiments.
Abstract
World models promise a paradigm shift in robotics, where an agent learns the underlying physics of its environment once to enable efficient planning and behavior learning. However, current world models are often hardware-locked specialists: a model trained on a Boston Dynamics Spot robot fails catastrophically on a Unitree Go1 due to the mismatch in kinematic and dynamic properties, as the model overfits to specific embodiment constraints rather than capturing the universal locomotion dynamics. Consequently, a slight change in actuator dynamics or limb length necessitates training a new model from scratch. In this work, we take a step towards a framework for training a generalizable Quadrupedal World Model (QWM) that disentangles environmental dynamics from robot morphology. We address the limitations of implicit system identification, where treating static physical properties (like…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
