TL;DR
This paper introduces SemJudge, a novel semiotic-based evaluator for generative art that assesses symbolic and indexical meanings, aligning more closely with human interpretation than existing methods.
Contribution
The work formalizes a Peircean semiotic framework for evaluating generative art and develops SemJudge, which captures deeper symbolic and indexical meanings in art evaluation.
Findings
SemJudge aligns more closely with human judgments than prior evaluators.
User studies show SemJudge produces deeper artistic interpretations.
SemJudge advances evaluation from surface-level quality to symbolic and indexical understanding.
Abstract
Interpretation is essential to deciphering the language of art: audiences communicate with artists by recovering meaning from visual artifacts. However, current Generative Art (GenArt) evaluators remain fixated on surface-level image quality or literal prompt adherence, failing to assess the deeper symbolic or abstract meaning intended by the creator. We address this gap by formalizing a Peircean computational semiotic theory that models Human-GenArt Interaction (HGI) as cascaded semiosis. This framework reveals that artistic meaning is conveyed through three modes - iconic, symbolic, and indexical - yet existing evaluators operate heavily within the iconic mode, remaining structurally blind to the latter two. To overcome this structural blindness, we propose SemJudge. This evaluator explicitly assesses symbolic and indexical meaning in HGI via a Hierarchical Semiosis Graph (HSG) that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
