Navigating Turbulence: The Challenge of Inclusive Innovation in the U.S.-China AI Race
Jyh-An Lee, Jingwen Liu

TL;DR
This chapter analyzes how U.S. and China legal frameworks influence AI innovation, highlighting differences in data privacy, IP rights, and export controls amid geopolitical rivalry.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of U.S. and China legal infrastructures and their impact on inclusive AI innovation and global exclusionary policies.
Findings
China's legal environment offers advantages in data access and IP protection.
The U.S. enforces strict export controls on AI-related technologies.
Legal frameworks shape the trajectory of the global AI race.
Abstract
This chapter examines the impact of the geopolitical rivalry between the United States and China on the prospects for inclusive innovation in artificial intelligence (AI) development. We explore three critical aspects of the American and Chinese legal infrastructure that significantly impact AI innovation: data privacy, intellectual property (IP rights), and export restrictions. Through this comparative analysis, we argue that, while China's legal environment may offer certain advantage in terms of access to training data and IP protection, the United States maintains superior resources by enforcing strict export controls on semiconductor chips, AI models, as well as outbound investments in these areas. This nuanced examination helps illuminate how each country's legal framework could influence the ultimate trajectory of AI race and how the technological rivalry has led to exclusionary…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
