Learning to Coordinate over Networks with Bounded Rationality
Zhewei Wang, Emrah Akyol, Marcos M. Vasconcelos

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how bounded rationality affects network coordination, showing that regular networks optimize coordination probability and providing bounds on rationality needed for effective collaboration.
Contribution
It introduces a theoretical framework connecting bounded rationality, network structure, and coordination success, highlighting the optimality of regular networks.
Findings
Stationary probability of coordination increases with rationality parameter β.
For K-regular networks, coordination probability increases with degree K.
Optimal network structure for coordination is K-regular, with evenly distributed connectivity.
Abstract
Network coordination games are widely used to model collaboration among interconnected agents, with applications across diverse domains including economics, robotics, and cyber-security. We consider networks of bounded-rational agents who interact through binary stag hunt games, a canonical game theoretic model for distributed collaborative tasks. Herein, the agents update their actions using logit response functions, yielding the Log-Linear Learning (LLL) algorithm. While convergence of LLL to a risk-dominant Nash equilibrium requires unbounded rationality, we consider regimes in which rationality is strictly bounded. We first show that the stationary probability of states corresponding to perfect coordination is monotone increasing in the rationality parameter . For -regular networks, we prove that the stationary probability of a perfectly coordinated action profile is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
