Behavior Latticing: Inferring User Motivations from Unstructured Interactions
Dora Zhao, Michelle S. Lam, Diyi Yang, Michael S. Bernstein

TL;DR
This paper presents behavior latticing, a novel architecture for personal AI systems that infers user motivations from unstructured interaction data, enabling deeper understanding and better addressing user needs.
Contribution
It introduces behavior latticing, connecting disparate behaviors to synthesize user motivations, and demonstrates its effectiveness in improving user understanding and AI responsiveness.
Findings
Behavior latticing produces more accurate user insights than state-of-the-art methods.
The approach enables AI agents to better address user needs with higher interpretive depth.
Experimental validation shows improved performance in understanding user motivations.
Abstract
A long-standing vision of computing is the personal AI system: one that understands us well enough to address our underlying needs. Today's AI focuses on what users do, ignoring why they might be doing such things in the first place. As a result, AI systems default to optimizing or repeating existing behaviors (e.g., user has ChatGPT complete their homework) even when they run counter to users' needs (e.g., gaining subject expertise). Instead we require systems that can make connections across observations, synthesizing them into insights about the motivations underlying these behaviors (e.g., user's ongoing commitments make it difficult to prioritize learning despite expressed desire to do so). We introduce an architecture for building user understanding through behavior latticing, connecting seemingly disparate behaviors, synthesizing them into insights, and repeating this process…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
