TL;DR
This paper proposes viewing large language models as lossy compressors, linking their information retention to performance and providing an information-theoretic framework for understanding their learning process.
Contribution
It introduces an information-theoretic perspective on LLM training, demonstrating how compression relates to model performance and interpretability.
Findings
Pre-training results approach the Information Bottleneck bound.
Different models compress differently based on data and training recipes.
Optimal compression correlates with downstream benchmark performance.
Abstract
Despite the increasing prevalence of large language models (LLMs), we still have a limited understanding of how their representational spaces are structured. This limits our ability to interpret how and what they learn or relate them to learning in humans. We argue LLMs are best seen as an instance of lossy compression, where over training they learn by retaining only information in their training data relevant to their objective(s). We show pre-training results in models that are optimally compressed for next-sequence prediction, approaching the Information Bottleneck bound on compression. Across an array of open weights models, each compresses differently, likely due to differences in the data and training recipes used. However even across different families of LLMs the optimality of a model's compression, and the information present in it, can predict downstream performance on across…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
