Determining the Free-Carrier Fraction in 2D Perovskites using Power Dependent Photoluminescence
Antonella Cutrupi, Marc Melendez Schofield, Raquel Utrera-Melero, Michel Frising, Enrique Arevalo Rodriguez, Upasana Das, Ferry Prins

TL;DR
This study introduces a quantitative method to determine the free-carrier fraction in 2D perovskites using power-dependent photoluminescence, improving understanding of excited states for optoelectronic applications.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel analysis approach based on the Saha-equation for directly quantifying free carriers in semiconductors with intermediate exciton binding energies.
Findings
Method agrees with known exciton binding energies in Ruddlesden-Popper perovskites.
Allows spatial mapping of free charge fractions near grain boundaries.
Highlights the impact of excitation density on excited-state interpretation.
Abstract
Determining the nature of the optical excited state (excitons or free carriers) in nanostructured materials is crucial for device design, as optoelectronic and photovoltaic technologies require different considerations regarding the optimized excited state dynamics. Power-dependent photoluminescence is widely used to distinguish between excitons and free carriers, but the classical power-law analysis oversimplifies the underlying physics when the exponent lies between the linear (pure excitons) and quadratic (pure free carriers) limits. In this work, we present a complete study enabling a direct and quantitative analysis of the free-carrier fraction based on power-dependent peak photoluminescence and placing its analysis in the context of the Saha-equation. We study Ruddlesden-Popper perovskites with varying thickness as a model system, as they cover a wide range of exciton binding…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
