On the Computational Complexity of Geometrically Local QAC0 circuits

TL;DR

This paper investigates the computational complexity of geometrically local QAC^0 quantum circuits, establishing simulation equivalences, depth lower bounds for Parity, and implications for the open problem of Parity in QAC^0.

Contribution

It proves that all QAC^0 circuits can be simulated by 2D local circuits with quadratic size blow-up and establishes depth lower bounds for 1D QAC^0 circuits computing Parity.

Findings

QAC^0 equals 2D-QAC^0 with quadratic size increase.

Nearly logarithmic depth lower bound for 1D-QAC^0 computing Parity.

Nearly linear depth requirement for contiguous input encoding to compute Parity.

Abstract

The computational complexity of $\mathsf{QAC}^0$, which are constant-depth, polynomial-size quantum circuit families consisting of arbitrary single-qubit unitaries and $n$-qubit generalized Toffoli gates, has gained tremendous focus recently. In this work, we initiate the study of the computational complexity of geometrically local $\mathsf{QAC}^0$ circuits, where all the generalized Toffoli gates act on nearest neighbor qubits. We show that any $\mathsf{QAC}^0$ circuit can be exactly simulated by a two-dimensional geometrically local $\mathsf{QAC}^0$ circuit, i.e., a $\mathsf{2D\text{-}QAC}^{0}$ circuit, with a quadratic size blow-up. This implies that $\mathsf{QAC}^0 = \mathsf{2D\text{-}QAC}^{0}$. We further show that if there existed a $\mathsf{QAC}^0$ circuit that computes Parity with a bounded constant error, then for any $\varepsilon > 0$, there would exist a $\mathsf{2D\text{-}QAC}^{0}$ circuit that exactly computes Parity, with a very "thin" width $n^\varepsilon$. We further study the computational power of $\mathsf{1D\text{-}QAC}^{0} $ circuits, i.e., one-dimensional $\mathsf{QAC}^0$ circuits, which are the "thinnest" $\mathsf{2D\text{-}QAC}^{0}$ circuits. We prove a nearly logarithmic depth lower bound on $\mathsf{1D\text{-}QAC}^{0} $ circuits to compute the Parity function, even if allowing an unlimited number of ancilla. Furthermore, if the inputs are encoded in contiguous qubits, we prove that it requires a nearly linear depth $\mathsf{1D\text{-}QAC}^{0} $ circuit to compute the Parity function. This lower bound is almost tight. The results are proved via the combination of the restriction argument and the light-cone argument. These results may provide a new angle for studying the computational power of $\mathsf{QAC}^0$ circuits and for resolving the long-standing open problem of whether Parity is in $\mathsf{QAC}^0$.