Measurement of Inclusive Charged-Current $\bar{\nu}_{\mu}$ Scattering on C, CH, Fe, and Pb at $\langle E_{\bar{\nu}}\rangle \sim$ 6 GeV with MINERvA
A. Klustov\'a, S. Akhter, Z. Ahmad Dar, M. Sajjad Athar, G. Caceres, H. da Motta, J. Felix, P. K. Gaur, R. Gran, E. Granados, D. A. Harris, A. L. Hart, J. Kleykamp, M. Kordosky, D. Last, A. Lozano, S. Manly, W. A. Mann, K. S. McFarland, M. Mehmood, O. Moreno, J. G. Morf\'in

TL;DR
MINERvA measured inclusive charged-current antimuon neutrino cross sections on various nuclei at around 6 GeV, revealing discrepancies with models especially at low transverse momentum, highlighting nuclear effect modeling issues.
Contribution
First measurement of these cross sections on multiple nuclei and their ratios at ~6 GeV, providing critical data for nuclear effect modeling in neutrino interactions.
Findings
Cross section uncertainties are 5-10% for absolute measurements.
Ratios have 2-5% uncertainties, enabling precise comparisons.
Significant model discrepancies observed, especially at low $p_T$.
Abstract
We report MINERvA's first measurement of inclusive charged-current cross sections on carbon, hydrocarbon, iron, and lead, and their ratios to the cross section on hydrocarbon, as functions of the antimuon transverse momentum, . Using a wide-band beam with mean energy , these measurements probe all interaction modes, including the transition from resonance production to deep-inelastic scattering. The total uncertainties are typically for the absolute cross sections and for the ratios. Comparisons with multiple neutrino interaction models reveal significant discrepancies in the dependence, particularly for heavier nuclei. The disagreements are most pronounced at low but extend across the full range, indicating missing or mis-modelled nuclear effects.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
