The Gaussian data assumption does not always lead to the largest CRB
Jean-Pierre Delmas, Habti Abeida

TL;DR
This paper clarifies that the Gaussian assumption does not always produce the largest CRB, especially when certain conditions are not met, and provides counterexamples with non-Gaussian distributions.
Contribution
It identifies specific conditions where Gaussian distributions maximize the CRB and presents counterexamples outside those conditions showing non-Gaussian distributions can have larger CRB.
Findings
Gaussian assumption yields largest CRB only under restrictive conditions
Counterexamples show non-Gaussian distributions can have larger CRB
Conditions include decoupled mean and covariance, mean parameter of interest, no nuisance parameters
Abstract
This lecture note addresses the common misconception that the Gaussian distribution always yields the largest Cram\'er-Rao Bound (CRB). We show that this property only holds under restrictive conditions: specifically, when the mean and covariance parameters are decoupled in the Fisher Information Matrix (FIM), when the parameter of interest lies in the mean vector and when there are no additive nuisance parameters. Beyond this framework, we provide counterexamples demonstrating that non-Gaussian distributions can produce larger CRB.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
