No Period Change in Two Long-Period AM CVn Binaries
Matthew J. Green, Thomas R. Marsh, Jan van Roestel, Tin Long Sunny Wong, Diogo Belloni, Mukremin Kilic, Elme Breedt, Alex Brown, Chris M. Copperwheat, Anurak Chakpor, V. S. Dhillon, Noel Castro Segura, Martin J. Dyer, James Garbutt, Dan Jarvis, Vasu Kengkriangkrai

TL;DR
This study finds no measurable orbital period change in two long-period AM CVn binaries, suggesting angular momentum loss is not significantly stronger than gravitational wave emission.
Contribution
The paper provides long-term eclipse timing measurements that set upper limits on period change, challenging models with additional angular momentum loss mechanisms.
Findings
Both systems show consistent with zero within 2.
Upper limits on are 1.1 ^{-13} and 9.7 ^{-14} s s^{-1}.
Results imply angular momentum loss beyond GWs is not dominant at these periods.
Abstract
Ultracompact binary systems, consisting of two compact objects in an orbit , should exhibit measurable rates of orbital period change () due to the emission of gravitational waves (GWs). Measurements of \pdot\ have so far been limited to the shortest-period ultracompact binaries (\,min). Among the AM\,CVn-type subclass, several works have proposed the presence of extra angular momentum loss beyond GW emission, with magnetic braking being a widely discussed mechanism. If present, this magnetic braking would dominate the angular momentum loss of AM\,CVn-type binaries with orbital periods \,min. In this work, we present a long-term eclipse timing study of two AM\,CVn-type binaries, YZ\,LMi and Gaia14aae, with respective orbital periods of 28.3\,min and 49.7\,min and continuous observations since 2006 and 2015. Both systems show…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
