Cost-sensitive retraining via posterior learning debt

TL;DR

This paper introduces a cost-sensitive decision framework for retraining Bayesian prediction systems based on posterior learning debt, improving retraining policies over traditional calendar-based methods in synthetic experiments.

Contribution

It formulates a novel cost-sensitive retraining decision based on posterior learning debt, providing a transparent, adaptable approach for Bayesian system maintenance.

Findings

Debt-threshold policies outperform calendar retraining in synthetic scenarios.

The approach improves predictive regret management over traditional methods.

Performance varies with score-unit sensitivity and policy choice.

Abstract

Deployed prediction systems are often retrained on fixed calendars, even when model staleness and retraining burden vary over time. This short communication formulates retraining for Bayesian prediction systems as a cost-sensitive predictive-regret decision. The central monitoring state is posterior learning debt, defined as the Kullback--Leibler divergence from a reference shadow posterior to the deployed frozen posterior. In the decision layer, a retraining cost is compared with the expected one-period predictive regret of waiting. A continuous-severity version retrains when calibrated expected regret exceeds the retraining cost, while the familiar two-state excess-loss rule is a special case. The empirical study is an exact-state proof-of-concept in a synthetic conjugate simulation with warm-started deployed and shadow normal-inverse-gamma posteriors, separate update, monitoring, and evaluation batches, lagged deployment actions, expanded baseline grids, and score-unit sensitivity. Under the primary 75th-percentile score-unit scaling, an age-adjusted debt-threshold policy improves on tuned calendar retraining in all 72 non-stable scenario cells and on tuned CUSUM in 58 of 72 cells, with mean relative objectives 0.677 and 0.975, respectively. Debt-utility and hybrid-utility policies also improve strongly over tuned calendar retraining, but they do not dominate tuned CUSUM. Median and mean score-unit sensitivities show the same main calendar result, while the CUSUM comparison remains policy-dependent. The contribution is a transparent decision layer for deployed Bayesian prediction systems, not a universal replacement for drift detection.