TL;DR
This paper introduces the robustness interval as a practical measure for tuning spiking reservoirs, demonstrating its effectiveness across various configurations and tasks, and validating the critical point as a reliable starting point.
Contribution
It bridges theoretical criticality with practical stability by defining and analyzing the robustness interval in spiking reservoir computing, supported by extensive experiments.
Findings
Robustness interval width decreases with network sparsity and firing threshold.
Specific parameter pairs preserve the analytical critical point, forming iso-performance manifolds.
The critical point consistently lies within high-performance regions, aiding parameter tuning.
Abstract
Spiking reservoir computing provides an energy-efficient approach to temporal processing, but reliably tuning reservoirs to operate at the edge-of-chaos is challenging due to experimental uncertainty. This work bridges abstract notions of criticality and practical stability by introducing and exploiting the robustness interval, an operational measure of the hyperparameter range over which a reservoir maintains performance above task-dependent thresholds. Through systematic evaluations of Leaky Integrate-and-Fire (LIF) architectures on both static (MNIST) and temporal (synthetic Ball Trajectories) tasks, we identify consistent monotonic trends in the robustness interval across a broad spectrum of network configurations: the robustness-interval width decreases with presynaptic connection density (i.e., directly with sparsity) and directly with the firing threshold . We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
