Insights into 1-loop corrections to neutrino low-scale type-I seesaw mechanism
Gennaro Miele, Stefano Morisi, Eduardo Peinado, and Kainat Qamar

TL;DR
This paper investigates 1-loop corrections in low-scale type-I seesaw models, highlighting the importance of a modified parametrization to accurately predict neutrino oscillation parameters and discussing implications for experimental searches.
Contribution
It introduces a modified Casas-Ibarra parametrization that correctly incorporates 1-loop corrections into neutrino mass predictions in low-scale seesaw models.
Findings
Naive Casas-Ibarra parametrization leads to incorrect neutrino oscillation predictions.
Modified parametrization reabsorbs 1-loop corrections, aligning predictions with experimental data.
Heavy neutral lepton searches are unaffected by 1-loop corrections, but ${\rm Br}(\mu\to e \gamma)$ constrains parameter space.
Abstract
The standard type-I seesaw can also be regarded as a low-scale seesaw by using the freedom of the Casas-Ibarra parameterization. In this framework, radiative corrections to the neutrino mass matrix can dominate over the tree-level contribution. We show that a naive use of the Casas-Ibarra parametrization in the presence of 1-loop corrections leads to incorrect predictions for the neutrino oscillation parameters. By using a modified Casas-Ibarra parametrization, in which 1-loop corrections are reabsorbed into the right-handed neutrino mass matrix, we obtain a light neutrino mass matrix consistent with experimental values. On the other hand, we show that physical processes related to right-handed neutrino propagation, such as heavy neutral lepton searches, do not depend on the 1-loop corrections. Moreover, we show that provides competitive constraints on the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
