TL;DR
MAT-Cell introduces a multi-agent, tree-structured reasoning framework for batch-level single-cell annotation, combining evidence grounding, reasoning, and debate to improve accuracy and transparency.
Contribution
It presents a novel prompt-driven framework that separates evidence grounding from label decision, enabling auditable debate traces and improved annotation accuracy.
Findings
Achieves 75.5% average accuracy on open-candidate benchmarks.
Outperforms baseline methods like CoT and scPilot in accuracy.
Reduces monetary cost through local inference.
Abstract
Automated single-cell annotation is difficult when the most abundant genes are not the most discriminative ones, or when a target state is poorly covered by a fixed reference atlas. GPTCelltype-style one-shot prompting allows large language models (LLMs) to produce plausible labels from generic expression signals, while reference-based annotators can force unfamiliar states into the nearest known category. We propose MAT-Cell, a prompt-driven framework for batch-level single-cell annotation that separates evidence grounding from label decision. MAT-Cell first uses Reverse Verification Query (RVQ) to combine tissue context, observed differentially expressed genes, and LLM-elicited biological priors into structured candidate-specific premises. Verifier agents then convert these premises into explicit premise-to-claim reasoning trees, and bounded multi-round debate compares,challenges, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
