TL;DR
This study compares various demonstration selection strategies for large language models in next POI prediction, finding that simple heuristics often outperform complex methods in accuracy and efficiency.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive evaluation of demonstration selection methods, highlighting the effectiveness of heuristic approaches over embedding-based strategies in real-world POI prediction.
Findings
Heuristic methods outperform embedding-based methods in prediction accuracy.
Simple heuristics are more computationally efficient than complex embedding-based strategies.
Demonstrations selected by heuristics can sometimes surpass fine-tuned models without additional training.
Abstract
This paper investigates demonstration selection strategies for predicting a user's next point-of-interest (POI) using large language models (LLMs), aiming to accurately forecast a user's subsequent location based on historical check-in data. While in-context learning (ICL) with LLMs has recently gained attention as a promising alternative to traditional supervised approaches, the effectiveness of ICL significantly depends on the selected demonstration. Although previous studies have examined methods such as random selection, embedding-based selection, and task-specific selection, there remains a lack of comprehensive comparative analysis among these strategies. To bridge this gap and clarify the best practices for real-world applications, we comprehensively evaluate existing demonstration selection methods alongside simpler heuristic approaches such as geographical proximity, temporal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
