TL;DR
This paper examines how constrained decoding in large language models can inadvertently cause a new failure mode called 'structure snowballing,' highlighting an inherent trade-off between structural control and model capacity.
Contribution
It demonstrates that structural constraints alone do not improve self-correction and can lead to new errors, revealing an 'alignment tax' in constrained decoding methods.
Findings
Imposing structural constraints does not enhance self-correction performance.
Strict formatting rules increase cognitive load, causing formatting traps.
Structural constraints can trigger 'structure snowballing' failures.
Abstract
Intrinsic self-correction in Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently fails in open-ended reasoning tasks due to ``hallucination snowballing,'' a phenomenon in which models recursively justify early errors during free-text reflection. While structured feedback can mitigate this issue, existing approaches often rely on externally trained critics or symbolic tools, reducing agent autonomy. This study investigates whether enforcing structured reflection purely through Outlines-based constrained decoding can disrupt error propagation without additional training. Evaluating an 8-billion-parameter model (Qwen3-8B), we show that simply imposing structural constraints does not improve self-correction performance. Instead, it triggers a new failure mode termed ``structure snowballing.'' We find that the cognitive load required to satisfy strict formatting rules pushes the model into formatting…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
