Direct Air Capture in Europe - Where to Integrate, Where to Store, and What Drives Cost?
Maximilian Bernecker, Felix M\"usgens

TL;DR
This study models the integration of Direct Air Capture and Storage (DACCS) into Europe's 2050 energy system, analyzing how storage location and system integration affect costs.
Contribution
It uniquely combines DACCS with long-term energy system models, assessing the impact of storage location and system integration on costs.
Findings
Limiting CO2 storage to North Sea increases costs by ~10%.
Neglecting system integration raises costs by up to 30%.
Integrated analysis reduces overall system costs.
Abstract
Direct Air Carbon Capture and Storage (DACCS) can mitigate hard-to-abate emissions, e.g. from transport or industry. However, there is a wide variety of cost estimates for DACCS, driven, to a significant extent, by differences in electricity cost. At the same time, there is a notable gap in research that integrates direct air capturing systems into long-term energy system models. We separate direct air capturing, carbon transport, and carbon storage and integrate them into a European capacity expansion model for a fully decarbonised electricity system in 2050. We explore how two dimensions affect the total system costs of DACCS. The first dimension is the availability of CO2 storage locations: In one analysis, storage locations are restricted to offshore storage locations in the North Sea only, i.e. depleted natural gas fields. The alternative analysis comprises suitable storage…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
