Hazard Management in Robot-Assisted Mammography Support
Ioannis Stefanakos, Roisin Bradley, Radu Calinescu, Beverley Townsend, Tianyuan Wang, Jihong Zhu

TL;DR
This paper introduces a hazard management methodology for a robotic mammography support system, combining stakeholder input with formal safety analysis techniques to identify and mitigate safety risks in clinical use.
Contribution
It presents a structured safety-driven design approach integrating stakeholder collaboration, SHARD, and STPA for assistive robots in healthcare settings.
Findings
Hazards often stem from timing mismatches and misinterpretations, not component failures.
Safety requirements were refined to mitigate identified hazards and reduce reliance on human timing.
The methodology is applicable to other assistive robotic systems in clinical environments.
Abstract
Robotic and embodied-AI systems have the potential to improve accessibility and quality of care in clinical settings, but their deployment in close physical contact with vulnerable patients introduces significant safety risks. This paper presents a hazard management methodology for MammoBot, an assistive robotic system designed to support patients during X-ray mammography. To ensure safety from early development stages, we combine stakeholder-guided process modelling with Software Hazard Analysis and Resolution in Design (SHARD) and System-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA). The robot-assisted workflow is defined collaboratively with clinicians, roboticists, and patient representatives to capture key human-robot interactions. SHARD is applied to identify technical and procedural deviations, while STPA is used to analyse unsafe control actions arising from user interaction. The results…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
