Resource Implications of Different Encodings for Quantum Computational Fluid Dynamics
Hans A. K\"osel, Roland Ewert, Jan W. Delfs

TL;DR
This paper examines the resource costs of different quantum encoding schemes for computational fluid dynamics, proposing a new approach optimized for quantum lattice Boltzmann methods.
Contribution
It extends previous resource estimates by explicitly calculating circuit depth and deriving empirical bounds for the number of runs needed, introducing a new encoding method for CFD.
Findings
Derived an upper bound for quantum algorithm executions scaling as n^2 ln(n).
Empirically verified resource estimates using IBM Qiskit simulations.
Proposed a new encoding approach tailored for quantum lattice Boltzmann methods.
Abstract
For quantum algorithms for problems in which the task is to compute an entire field of values, like e.g. computational fluid dynamics (CFD), it is often proposed amplitude encoding w.r.t. multiple qubits; however, the efforts implied by it for initialization and read-out are not addressed. This work is devoted specifically to this issue: It reviews different encoding schemes in quantum computing, discussing their computational costs for initialization and read-out as well as resulting aspects for their usage via minimal examples. The considerations in previous literature on the required computational resources for amplitude encoding w.r.t. multiple qubits are extended in the presented quantification by explicitly deducing the circuit depth that results for the decomposed initialization procedure of V. V. Shende et al. [1, 2] and deriving an upper bound for the necessary number of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
