TL;DR
This paper investigates the effects of sub-sequence splitting (SSS) on sequential recommendation models, revealing that SSS can both improve and hinder performance depending on its application and combination with other methods.
Contribution
The study uncovers how SSS impacts model evaluation and performance, emphasizing the importance of proper usage and combinations in sequential recommendation tasks.
Findings
SSS can interfere with accurate model evaluation.
Effective SSS requires specific splitting methods, target strategies, and loss functions.
SSS improves training data distribution and item targeting likelihood.
Abstract
Sub-sequence splitting (SSS) has been demonstrated as an effective approach to mitigate data sparsity in sequential recommendation (SR) by splitting a raw user interaction sequence into multiple sub-sequences. Previous studies have demonstrated its ability to enhance the performance of SR models significantly. However, in this work, we discover that \textbf{(i). SSS may interfere with the evaluation of the model's actual performance.} We observed that many recent state-of-the-art SR models employ SSS during the data reading stage (not mentioned in the papers). When we removed this operation, performance significantly declined, even falling below that of earlier classical SR models. The varying improvements achieved by SSS and different splitting methods across different models prompt us to analyze further when SSS proves effective. We find that \textbf{(ii). SSS demonstrates strong…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
