Scientific Validation of the SPARC4 Pipeline: Multi-band Imaging, Polarimetry, and Photometric Time Series for Improved Characterization of Transiting Exoplanets
Eder Martioli, Claudia V. Rodrigues, Julio C. N. Campagnolo, Francisco J. Jablonski, Ana Carolina Mattiuci, Fernando Falkenberg, Gustavo H. S. Santos, Marina M. C. Mello, Isabel J. Lima, Filipe V. M. Monteiro, Luciano Fraga, Leandro de Almeida, Diego Lorenzo-Oliveira

TL;DR
The SPARC4 Pipeline enables high-precision multi-band imaging and polarimetry for transiting exoplanet characterization, validated through observations achieving sub-arcsecond astrometry and precise photometric and polarimetric measurements.
Contribution
This work introduces the SPARC4 Pipeline, a robust data reduction suite for processing photometric and polarimetric data from the SPARC4 instrument, enhancing exoplanet analysis capabilities.
Findings
Achieved 0.02% photometric precision over 15-minute cadences.
Instrumental polarization below 0.06%, linear polarization accuracy of 0.2%.
Refined exoplanet parameters using joint modeling with TESS and K2 data.
Abstract
High-cadence multi-band imaging and polarimetry have important scientific applications in astronomy. Observations of transits of exoplanets are a particular application that requires robust data reduction and analysis. We present the SPARC4 Pipeline, a suite of routines developed to process photometric and polarimetric data obtained with the instrument SPARC4 installed on the 1.6 m telescope at Pico dos Dias Observatory, Brazil. The scientific data products, up to the generation of high-cadence time series, are demonstrated using observations of several transiting exoplanetary systems in both photometric and polarimetric modes. These observations are used to produce stacked calibrated images, yielding sub-arcsecond astrometric accuracy even in sparse fields. The time series of these fields enabled a photometric characterization of the instrument. Observations of polarimetric standard…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
