Winding Back the Clock: Recent Star Formation Histories of Massive Quiescent Galaxies Are Consistent With Their Rapid Number Density Evolution Since $\mathbf{z\sim7}$
Yunchong Zhang, Zhiyuan Ji, Rachel Bezanson, Christina C. Williams, Gabriel Brammer, Aidan P. Cloonan, Anna de Graaff, Jenny E. Greene, Michaela Hirschmann, Christian Kragh Jespersen, Gourav Khullar, Claudia del P. Lagos, Joel Leja, Michael V. Maseda, Ian McConachie

TL;DR
This study uses JWST data and stellar population modeling to show that the evolution of massive quiescent galaxies' number densities since z~7 aligns with their star formation histories, confirming the consistency of observational data.
Contribution
It demonstrates that reconstructed number densities from star formation histories agree with observations up to z~7, supporting the reliability of stellar population synthesis models for distant galaxies.
Findings
Reconstructed number densities match observed data up to z~7.
Bayesian spectro-photometric fitting effectively infers galaxy star formation histories.
Results reinforce the tension between observations and models at 3<z<7.
Abstract
Massive quiescent galaxies have been identified out to in early JWST data in a substantial excess ( at ) of number densities from most theoretical predictions. We investigate whether the number densities implied by the star formation histories of quiescent galaxies at are consistent with the observed number density evolution of that population since . For this work, we rely on stellar population synthesis modeling of JWST NIRCam photometry (from CEERS and PRIMER) and NIRSpec/PRISM spectra of massive () quiescent galaxies in the RUBIES survey. We infer their star-formation histories through Bayesian spectro-photometric fitting with Prospector, exploring the sensitivity of our results to stellar libraries and SFH priors. For each source, we compute a timescale over which it would be identified as quiescent --…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
