Dominating Set with Quotas: Balancing Coverage and Constraints
Sobyasachi Chatterjee, Sushmita Gupta, Saket Saurabh, Sanjay Seetharaman, Anannya Upasana

TL;DR
This paper introduces the Dominating Set with Quotas (DSQ), a generalized problem balancing coverage and constraints, and explores its computational complexity and algorithmic solutions across various graph classes.
Contribution
It proves DSQ is W[1]-hard on sparse graphs but fixed-parameter tractable on graphs with bounded treewidth and nowhere dense classes, and provides a subexponential algorithm for apex-minor-free graphs.
Findings
DSQ is W[1]-hard on graphs with degeneracy 2 and excluding K_{3,3}
DSQ is FPT when parameterized by solution size and treewidth
A subexponential algorithm for DSQ on apex-minor-free graphs
Abstract
We study a natural generalization of the classical \textsc{Dominating Set} problem, called \textsc{Dominating Set with Quotas} (DSQ). In this problem, we are given a graph \( G \), an integer \( k \), and for each vertex \( v \in V(G) \), a lower quota \( \mathrm{lo}_v \) and an upper quota \( \mathrm{up}_v \). The goal is to determine whether there exists a set \( S \subseteq V(G) \) of size at most \( k \) such that for every vertex \( v \in V(G) \), the number of vertices in its closed neighborhood that belong to \( S \), i.e., \( |N[v] \cap S| \), lies within the range \( [\mathrm{lo}_v, \mathrm{up}_v] \). This richer model captures a variety of practical settings where both under- and over-coverage must be avoided -- such as in fault-tolerant infrastructure, load-balanced facility placement, or constrained communication networks. While DS is already known to be computationally…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
