Assessment of PLATO Science Performance
Juan Cabrera, Heike Rauer, Reza Samadi, Valerio Nascimbeni, Anko Boerner, Denis Grie{\ss}bach, Carsten Paproth, Martin Pertena{\i}s, Sami-M. Niemi, Szilard Csizmadia, Asier Abreu, Conny Aerts, Suzanne Aigrain, Matthias Ammler-von Eiff, Beatriz Aparicio del Moral

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the expected planet detection yield of the upcoming PLATO mission, considering current uncertainties in planet occurrence rates and stellar noise, to inform follow-up resource planning.
Contribution
It provides updated estimates of PLATO's detection yield by analyzing various assumptions and noise factors, aiding mission planning and scientific understanding.
Findings
Estimated detection yield varies with planet occurrence rates.
Stellar variability significantly impacts detection capabilities.
Results help constrain planet formation models.
Abstract
The PLATO mission is scheduled for launch early 2027. In this paper we present an overview of the performance drivers for the mission at the time where all flight models of the cameras have been tested and integrated on the optical bench. The PLATO consortium needs an estimate of the planet detection yield to dimension the ground-based radial velocity follow-up resources. We provide updated estimates on the yield of planet detections that can be expected from the mission under certain assumptions. As of today, large uncertainties remain on the planet occurrence rates, especially for small planets in long-period orbits, and on our ability to detect these planets in the presence of stellar variability and instrumental noise. To partially overcome these limitations, we compare results using different planet occurrence rates, detectability rates, and we include an estimate on the expected…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
