Galileon versus Quintessence: A comparative phase space analysis and late-time cosmic relevance
Mohd Shahalam

TL;DR
This paper compares the phase space dynamics of light mass Galileon and Quintessence models, revealing that Galileon models lack stable late-time acceleration solutions under certain potentials, unlike Quintessence.
Contribution
It provides a systematic phase space analysis highlighting the qualitative differences between Galileon and Quintessence cosmologies for late-time acceleration.
Findings
Galileon models have only saddle points, no stable late-time attractors.
Quintessence models with cosh potentials have stable de-Sitter attractors.
Higher-order Galileon interactions may be needed for stable acceleration.
Abstract
We perform a comparative phase space analysis of the light mass Galileon model and standard Quintessence in the context of late--time cosmic acceleration. Focusing on a spatially flat FLRW background, we consider a cubic Galileon interaction supplemented by a scalar potential and examine three representative choices of the potential: a generalized cosh potential, a simple cosh potential, and a linear potential. By introducing suitable dimensionless variables, the cosmological field equations are reformulated as an autonomous dynamical system, allowing a systematic investigation of the stationary points and their stability properties. For the light mass Galileon scenario, we find that although the phase space admits scalar field dominated solutions, all critical points are of saddle type for the potentials considered. In particular, no stable late-time accelerating attractor emerges,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
