Disentangling electronic and phononic contributions to high-temperature superconductivity in X2MH6 hydrides
Feng Zheng, Shiya Chen, Zhen Zhang, Renhai Wang, Feng Zhang, Zi-zhong Zhu, Cai-Zhuang Wang, Vladimir Antropov, Yang Sun, Kai-Ming Ho

TL;DR
This study analyzes how electronic and phononic factors influence high-temperature superconductivity in X2MH6 hydrides, revealing electronic effects as dominant and providing insights for designing new superconductors.
Contribution
It uniquely disentangles electronic and phononic contributions to Tc in X2MH6 hydrides, identifying key factors affecting superconductivity and their interplay under pressure.
Findings
Electronic contribution dominates Tc in X2MH6 hydrides.
Key factors include X-H bond distance, hydrogen electron localization, and density of states.
Pressure effects are competing, enhancing electronic but weakening phononic contributions.
Abstract
Understanding the factors that control superconductivity is essential for discovering new superconducting materials using high-throughput elemental substitution. Focusing on the recently predicted ambient-pressure superconducting X2MH6 family, we disentangle the phononic and electronic contributions to Tc to determine how isoelectronic substitution alters superconductivity. While substitution affects both phononic and electronic properties, the electronic contribution plays the dominant role in determining Tc in the X2MH6 family. We show that the electronic contribution is affected by three key factors: the X-H bond distance, the electron localization function networking value of hydrogen, and the hydrogen-projected density of states at the Fermi level. A combined figure of merit derived from these parameters exhibits a robust correlation with Tc across the family. We further show that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
