Effects of Various Bipolar Approximations of Active Regions on Solar Surface Magnetic Field Simulations
Yukun Luo, Jie Jiang, Ruihui Wang

TL;DR
This study evaluates how different bipolar magnetic region approximations affect solar surface magnetic field simulations, revealing overestimations with symmetric models and proposing improved asymmetric approaches.
Contribution
It systematically assesses the impact of bipolar approximation methods on SFT models and introduces a new combined approach for more accurate simulations.
Findings
Symmetric BMRs overestimate axial dipole strength at solar minimum.
Asymmetric BMRs show a linear negative dependence of dipole strength on polarity size ratio.
A combined BMR size and polarity ratio improves simulation accuracy.
Abstract
The evolution of solar surface magnetic fields is essential for understanding solar activity and the underlying dynamic process. The surface flux transport (SFT) model is a widely used and effective tool for simulating this evolution. Active regions are incorporated as magnetic flux sources of the SFT model, but their configurations are usually simplified as symmetric or asymmetric bipolar magnetic regions (BMRs). Here, we aim to quantitatively and systematically assess how such flux source approximations affect SFT results and explore improved approximation methods using our recently developed SFT code. By comparing simulations that incorporate realistic active region configurations from solar cycle 23 through the ongoing cycle 25, we show that approximating active regions as symmetric BMRs leads to a systematic overestimation of the axial dipole strength at solar minimum. This result…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
