Formalizing CHSH Rigidity in Lean 4
Tianrun Zhao, Nengkun Yu

TL;DR
This paper formalizes the CHSH rigidity theorem in Lean 4, proving that near-optimal strategies are essentially equivalent to canonical qubit strategies, and identifies a gap in prior proofs.
Contribution
It provides a formal proof of the CHSH rigidity theorem in Lean 4 and uncovers a gap in previous related arguments.
Findings
Formal proof of CHSH rigidity theorem in Lean 4
Identification of a gap in McKague, Yang, and Scarani's argument
Clarification of the structure of near-optimal quantum strategies
Abstract
Violation of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality certifies genuine quantum correlations. In this work, we formalize in Lean 4 the rigidity theorem -- any strategy achieving near-optimal CHSH value must be locally isometric to the canonical qubit strategy. In the course of formalization, we identified a gap in the argument of McKague, Yang, and Scarani (arXiv:1203.2976).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
