Bridging Restoration and Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Retinal Fundus Enhancement

TL;DR

This paper introduces EyeBench-V2, a comprehensive benchmark for retinal fundus image enhancement that evaluates models on clinical relevance, expert-guided assessments, and practical downstream tasks.

Contribution

The work presents a multi-dimensional evaluation framework, a curated dataset for fair comparison, and insights to guide future clinically aligned enhancement models.

Findings

Standard metrics fail to capture clinical features

Expert-guided evaluation reveals model limitations

Benchmark enables informed model selection for clinical use

Abstract

Over the past decade, generative models have demonstrated success in enhancing fundus images. However, the evaluation of these models remains a challenge. A benchmark for fundus image enhancement is needed for three main reasons:(1) Conventional denoising metrics such as PSNR and SSIM fail to capture clinically relevant features, such as lesion preservation and vessel morphology consistency, limiting their applicability in real-world settings; (2) There is a lack of unified evaluation protocols that address both paired and unpaired enhancement methods, particularly those guided by clinical expertise; and (3) An evaluation framework should provide actionable insights to guide future advancements in clinically aligned enhancement models. To address these gaps, we introduce EyeBench-V2, a benchmark designed to bridge the gap between enhancement model performance and clinical utility. Our work offers three key contributions:(1) Multi-dimensional clinical-alignment through downstream evaluations: Beyond standard enhancement metrics, we assess performance across clinically meaningful tasks including vessel segmentation, diabetic retinopathy (DR) grading, generalization to unseen noise patterns, and lesion segmentation. (2) Expert-guided evaluation design: We curate a novel dataset enabling fair comparisons between paired and unpaired enhancement methods, accompanied by a structured manual assessment protocol by medical experts, which evaluates clinically critical aspects such as lesion structure alterations, background color shifts, and the introduction of artificial structures. (3) Actionable insights: Our benchmark provides a rigorous, task-oriented analysis of existing generative models, equipping clinical researchers with the evidence needed to make informed decisions, while also identifying limitations in current methods to inform the design of next-generation enhancement models.