Virtual element approximation of eigenvalue problems: is the stabilization of the right hand side necessary?
Daniele Boffi, Francesca Gardini, Lucia Gastaldi

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that for certain eigenvalue problems, stabilization of the mass matrix in virtual element methods is unnecessary, simplifying the approximation process without sacrificing accuracy.
Contribution
It proves that stabilization of the mass matrix is not needed for elliptic self-adjoint eigenvalue problems with lower order VEM spaces, extending to higher order schemes.
Findings
Stabilization of the mass matrix can be omitted in certain VEM eigenvalue problems.
Numerical tests confirm the theoretical results across various mesh sequences.
Simplifies the implementation of VEM for eigenvalue problems.
Abstract
The VEM approximation of eigenvalue problems usually involves the appropriate tuning of stabilization parameters, unless self-stabilizing or stabilization-free VEM are used. In this paper we prove that for elliptic self-adjoint eigenvalue problems the stabilization of the mass matrix is not necessary when lower order standard VEM spaces are adopted. Numerical evidence shows that also for higher order schemes the same result is true on various mesh sequences.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
