Surface-access limitation in catalytic porous monoliths: Performance diagnosis using pore-resolved CFD
Olivier Gu\'evremont, Olivier Gazil, Federico Galli, Nick Virgilio, Bruno Blais

TL;DR
This study uses pore-resolved CFD to diagnose surface-access limitations in catalytic porous monoliths, revealing how topology influences reactor performance and offering a framework for design optimization.
Contribution
It introduces reactive pore-resolved CFD for diagnosing surface-access limitations and compares different monolith structures, highlighting topology's role in performance and power efficiency.
Findings
Surface-access limitations can significantly restrict conversion despite low Damköhler numbers.
Topology affects required pumping power, with optimized structures reducing power by up to an order of magnitude.
Reactive PRCFD effectively diagnoses and compares porous reactor geometries under realistic conditions.
Abstract
Porous monoliths are promising catalyst supports due to their high surface area, interconnected channels, thermal stability and mechanical robustness. However, their tunable topology complicates design: trade-offs between conversion and pressure drop are not reliably captured by macroscopic descriptors, such as porosity, specific surface area, or tortuosity. Pore-resolved computational fluid dynamics~(PRCFD) addresses this gap by resolving pore-scale flow and transport, enabling diagnostics and discrimination between macroscopically similar structures. We investigate surface-access-boundedness: a case where conversion is limited by flow maldistribution and incomplete utilisation of the catalytic surface, even at low Damk\"ohler numbers (Da<1). Using palladium-nanoparticle-coated silicone monoliths for p-nitrophenol reduction, we perform reactive PRCFD in microcomputed-tomography-based…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
