Artificial Intelligence and Systemic Risk: A Unified Model of Performative Prediction, Algorithmic Herding, and Cognitive Dependency in Financial Markets

TL;DR

This paper presents a unified model showing how AI adoption in financial markets can increase systemic risk through interconnected channels, with empirical validation indicating significant tail-loss amplification.

Contribution

It introduces a comprehensive theoretical framework linking AI adoption to systemic risk, including a novel equilibrium coupling and empirical validation using SEC filings.

Findings

Systemic risk coupling grows superlinearly with AI penetration.

Market fragility increases convexly with AI adoption.

Empirical analysis shows tail-loss amplification of 18-54%.

Abstract

We develop a unified model in which AI adoption in financial markets generates systemic risk through three mutually reinforcing channels: performative prediction, algorithmic herding, and cognitive dependency. Within an extended rational expectations framework with endogenous adoption, we derive an equilibrium systemic risk coupling $r(\phi) = \phi\rho\beta/\lambda'(\phi)$, where $\phi$ is the AI adoption share, $\rho$ the algorithmic signal correlation, $\beta$ the performative feedback intensity, and $\lambda'(\phi)$ the endogenous effective price impact. Because $\lambda'(\phi)$ is decreasing in $\phi$, the coupling is convex in adoption, implying that the systemic risk multiplier $M = (1 - r)^{-1}$ grows superlinearly as AI penetration increases. The model is developed in three layers. First, endogenous fragility: market depth is decreasing and convex in AI adoption. Second, embedding the convex coupling within a supermodular adoption game produces a saddle-node bifurcation into an algorithmic monoculture. Third, cognitive dependency as an endogenous state variable yields an impossibility theorem (hysteresis requires dynamics beyond static frameworks) and a channel necessity theorem (each channel is individually necessary). Empirical validation uses the complete universe of SEC Form 13F filings (99.5 million holdings, 10,957 institutional managers, 2013--2024) with a Bartik shift-share instrument (first-stage $F = 22.7$). The model implies tail-loss amplification of 18--54%, economically significant relative to Basel III countercyclical buffers.