Self-Regulated Personal Contracts as a Harm Reduction Approach to Generative AI in Undergraduate Programming Education
Aadarsh Padiyath, Jessica Shen, Barbara Ericson

TL;DR
This study introduces a harm reduction-based self-regulated contract to help undergraduate students make intentional decisions about using GenAI tools in programming, highlighting its benefits and challenges.
Contribution
It presents a novel, non-binding contract framework grounded in harm reduction and self-regulated learning to promote deliberate GenAI use in education.
Findings
58% of students reported the intervention changed their thinking
Students created helpful accountability structures
Sustaining guidelines was challenging due to decision-making burden
Abstract
Students learning programming exercise agency in deciding when and how to use GenAI tools like ChatGPT. However, this agency is often implicit and shaped by deadline pressure and peer behavior rather than explicit and conscious learning goals. We designed a GenAI Contract grounded in harm reduction and self-regulated learning theory to scaffold intentional decision-making: students articulated personal learning goals, created usage guidelines, and reflected on alignment at strategic points across an eleven-week semester. The contract was non-binding and graded only for completion, emphasizing self-awareness over enforcement. We implemented this with N=217 students in an intermediate Python course. For students still forming their relationship with GenAI, it worked, as 58% of students reported the intervention changing their thinking and created helpful accountability structures.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
