Equivalence between the Functional Equation and Vorono\"{\i}-type summation identities for a class of $L$-Functions
Arindam Roy, Jagannath Sahoo, Akshaa Vatwani

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that Voronoi-type summation identities for certain $L$-functions are equivalent to their functional equations, revealing a structural link between these identities and the properties of the $L$-functions.
Contribution
It establishes the equivalence between Voronoi-type summation identities and the functional equations of a class of $L$-functions, providing new insights into their structural properties.
Findings
Voronoi-type summation identities imply the functional equation of $L$-functions.
A given arithmetic function appears as a coefficient of a Dirichlet series if and only if it satisfies the summation formulas.
The structural properties of $L$-functions can be derived from their summation identities.
Abstract
To date, the best methods for estimating the growth of mean values of arithmetic functions rely on the Vorono\"{\i} summation formula. By noticing a general pattern in the proof of his summation formula, Vorono\"{\i} postulated that analogous summation formulas for can be obtained with ``nice" test functions , provided is an ``arithmetic function". These arithmetic functions are called so because they are expected to appear as coefficients of some -functions satisfying certain properties. It has been well-known that the functional equation for a general -function can be used to derive a Vorono\"{\i}-type summation identity for that -function. In this article, we show that such a Vorono\"{\i}-type summation identity in fact endows the -function with some structural properties, yielding in particular the functional equation. We do this by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
