
TL;DR
This paper develops algorithms that leverage randomized hypotheses to achieve optimal error rates in learning tasks with adversarial noise, improving upon deterministic approaches across various noise models.
Contribution
It introduces the first algorithms with optimal error bounds for learning with adversarial noise using randomized hypotheses, answering open questions and closing gaps in prior work.
Findings
Optimal error for malicious noise: ½ * η/(1-η)
Optimal error for nasty noise: 3/2 * η (distribution-independent), η (fixed-distribution)
Optimal error for agnostic/nasty classification noise: η
Abstract
We construct algorithms with optimal error for learning with adversarial noise. The overarching theme of this work is that the use of \textsl{randomized} hypotheses can substantially improve upon the best error rates achievable with deterministic hypotheses. - For -rate malicious noise, we show the optimal error is , improving on the optimal error of deterministic hypotheses by a factor of . This answers an open question of Cesa-Bianchi et al. (JACM 1999) who showed randomness can improve error by a factor of . - For -rate nasty noise, we show the optimal error is for distribution-independent learners and for fixed-distribution learners, both improving upon the optimal error of deterministic hypotheses. This closes a gap first noted by Bshouty et al. (Theoretical Computer Science 2002)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
