Feature Attribution Stability Suite: How Stable Are Post-Hoc Attributions?
Kamalasankari Subramaniakuppusamy, Jugal Gajjar

TL;DR
The paper introduces FASS, a benchmark suite for evaluating the stability of post-hoc feature attribution methods under various realistic perturbations, emphasizing the importance of prediction invariance.
Contribution
FASS provides a comprehensive, prediction-invariance conditioned evaluation framework with multiple stability metrics across diverse perturbations and datasets.
Findings
Geometric perturbations cause more attribution instability than photometric ones.
Without prediction-invariance filtering, up to 99% of attribution pairs involve prediction changes.
Grad-CAM shows the highest stability among evaluated attribution methods.
Abstract
Post-hoc feature attribution methods are widely deployed in safety-critical vision systems, yet their stability under realistic input perturbations remains poorly characterized. Existing metrics evaluate explanations primarily under additive noise, collapse stability to a single scalar, and fail to condition on prediction preservation, conflating explanation fragility with model sensitivity. We introduce the Feature Attribution Stability Suite (FASS), a benchmark that enforces prediction-invariance filtering, decomposes stability into three complementary metrics: structural similarity, rank correlation, and top-k Jaccard overlap-and evaluates across geometric, photometric, and compression perturbations. Evaluating four attribution methods (Integrated Gradients, GradientSHAP, Grad-CAM, LIME) across four architectures and three datasets-ImageNet-1K, MS COCO, and CIFAR-10, FASS shows that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
