TL;DR
This paper introduces neural posterior estimation (NPE) for rapid, accurate, and interpretable inverse parameter inference in Li-ion batteries, significantly reducing calibration time while maintaining accuracy.
Contribution
The work demonstrates that NPE can calibrate battery models efficiently in high-dimensional spaces, offering advantages over traditional Bayesian methods.
Findings
NPE reduces calibration time from minutes to milliseconds.
NPE achieves equal or better parameter accuracy than Bayesian calibration.
NPE provides interpretability benefits like local parameter sensitivity.
Abstract
Diagnosing the internal state of Li-ion batteries is critical for battery research, operation of real-world systems, and prognostic evaluation of remaining lifetime. By using physics-based models to perform probabilistic parameter estimation via Bayesian calibration, diagnostics can account for the uncertainty due to model fitness, data noise, and the observability of any given parameter. However, Bayesian calibration in Li-ion batteries using electrochemical data is computationally intensive even when using a fast surrogate in place of physics-based models, requiring many thousands of model evaluations. A fully amortized alternative is neural posterior estimation (NPE). NPE shifts the computational burden from the parameter estimation step to data generation and model training, reducing the parameter estimation time from minutes to milliseconds, enabling real-time applications. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
