Do Emotions in Prompts Matter? Effects of Emotional Framing on Large Language Models
Minda Zhao, Yutong Yang, Chufei Peng, Rachel Gonsalves, Weiyue Li, Ruyi Yang, Zhixi Liu, Mengyu Wang

TL;DR
This paper investigates how emotional framing in prompts influences large language model performance, finding effects are generally mild but can be enhanced through adaptive emotional prompting strategies.
Contribution
It introduces EmotionRL, an adaptive framework for emotional prompt selection, demonstrating improved reliability over fixed emotional cues.
Findings
Emotional prefixes cause small accuracy changes across tasks.
Effects are more variable in socially grounded tasks.
Adaptive emotional prompting improves reliability of LLM performance.
Abstract
Emotional tone is pervasive in human communication, yet its influence on large language model (LLM) behaviour remains unclear. Here, we examine how first-person emotional framing in user-side queries affect LLM performance across six benchmark domains, including mathematical reasoning, medical question answering, reading comprehension, commonsense reasoning and social inference. Across models and tasks, static emotional prefixes usually produce only small changes in accuracy, suggesting that affective phrasing is typically a mild perturbation rather than a reliable general-purpose intervention. This stability is not uniform: effects are more variable in socially grounded tasks, where emotional context more plausibly interacts with interpersonal reasoning. Additional analyses show that stronger emotional wording induces only modest extra change, and that human-written prefixes reproduce…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
