
TL;DR
This paper advocates a pragmatist view of quantum theory, emphasizing its role as a tool for predicting event likelihoods rather than describing an objective physical reality.
Contribution
It introduces a perspectival interpretation of quantum outcomes and states, resolving the measurement problem by relativizing facts to physical contexts.
Findings
Measurement outcomes are perspectival and relativized to physical contexts.
Relativizing facts resolves the measurement problem and nonlocality issues.
Quantum statistics align with outcomes certified in a single, objective context.
Abstract
I take a pragmatist perspective on quantum theory. This is not a view of the world described by quantum theory. In this view quantum theory itself does not describe the physical world, nor our observatons, experiences or opinions of it. Instead, the theory offers reliable advice on when to expect an event of one kind or another, and on how strongly to expect each possible outcome of that event. The actual outcome is a perspectival fact: a fact relative to a physical context of assessment. Measurement outcomes and quantum states are both perspectival. By noticing that each must be relativized to an appropriate physical context one can resolve the measurement problem and the problem of nonlocal action. But if the outcome of a quantum measurement is not an absolute fact, then why shoud the statistics of such outcomes give us any objective reason to accept quantum theory? One can describe…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
