Unusually Hot Interiors Could Reconcile the Missing Methane Problem for Warm-to-Hot Exoplanets with Hydrogen Atmospheres
Xinting Yu, Christopher R. Glein, Daniel P. Thorngren, and David F. Murray

TL;DR
This paper introduces a rapid analytical framework to assess whether elevated internal temperatures can explain the observed methane depletion in warm-to-hot exoplanets with hydrogen atmospheres, providing insights into their interior heating processes.
Contribution
The study presents a simple, geochemistry-inspired analytical model that constrains minimum intrinsic temperatures of exoplanets from JWST atmospheric data, revealing potential additional heating mechanisms.
Findings
Several exoplanets require higher internal temperatures than standard models predict.
Some targets are consistent with lower intrinsic temperatures or show degeneracies.
A subset of planets deviate from the empirical Teq-Tint trend, indicating extra heating processes.
Abstract
JWST is revolutionizing the field of exoplanet atmospheres by delivering unprecedented spectroscopic constraints on their chemical compositions. It has provided tight constraints on the abundances of dominant carbon- and oxygen-bearing species on numerous warm-to-hot exoplanets with hydrogen-dominated atmospheres. Under thermochemical equilibrium, many of these exoplanets should have abundant methane (CH4); however, CH4 has, so far, only been spotted in a few cases. Here, we present a simple, geochemistry-inspired framework to explore whether elevated intrinsic temperatures (T) can account for the CH4 depletions. Instead of using computationally expensive, forward grid models, our fast analytical framework focuses on two key chemical equilibria: CO-CH4 and CO-CO2, allowing us to quickly constrain the minimum Tint that is consistent with JWST-observed abundances of H2O, CO,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
