Preserving Target Distributions With Differentially Private Count Mechanisms
Nitin Kohli, Paul Laskowski

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel two-stage framework for privatizing count tables that preserves distribution accuracy, featuring a new cyclic Laplace mechanism and an efficient constructor algorithm, improving privacy-utility tradeoffs.
Contribution
It formalizes a distribution-focused approach to differential privacy, proposing a new cyclic Laplace mechanism and a transition matrix constructor algorithm for better count privatization.
Findings
The cyclic Laplace mechanism outperforms existing histogram mechanisms.
The transition matrix approach achieves favorable tradeoffs in accuracy and runtime.
Experiments demonstrate practical advantages of the fixed-point method.
Abstract
Differentially private mechanisms are increasingly used to publish tables of counts, where each entry represents the number of individuals belonging to a particular category. A distribution of counts summarizes the information in the count column, unlinking counts from categories. This object is useful for answering a class of research questions, but it is subject to statistical biases when counts are privatized with standard mechanisms. This motivates a novel design criterion we term accuracy of distribution. This study formalizes a two-stage framework for privatizing tables of counts that balances accuracy of distribution with two standard criteria of accuracy of counts and runtime. In the first stage, a distribution privatizer generates an estimate for the true distribution of counts. We introduce a new mechanism, called the cyclic Laplace, specifically tailored to distributions of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
