Euclid preparation. Non-Gaussianity of 2-pt statistics likelihood: Parameter inference with a non-Gaussian likelihood in Fourier and configuration space
Euclid Collaboration: S. Gouyou Beauchamps (1, 2), J. Bel (3), P. Baratta (4, 5), C. Carbone (6), B. Altieri (7), S. Andreon (8), N. Auricchio (9), C. Baccigalupi (10, 11, 12, 13), M. Baldi (14, 9, 15), S. Bardelli (9), P. Battaglia (9), F. Bernardeau (16, 17), A. Biviano (11

TL;DR
This study evaluates the impact of non-Gaussian likelihood modeling on cosmological parameter inference for Euclid data, finding that a Gaussian likelihood remains sufficiently accurate despite observed skewness.
Contribution
It demonstrates that including full skewness in the likelihood does not significantly improve parameter constraints over a Gaussian approximation for Euclid-like surveys.
Findings
Including only the diagonal skewness suffices for accurate inference.
Full skewness tensor adds noise without improving results.
Gaussian likelihood remains robust for Euclid 2-point statistics.
Abstract
In this work we account for this skewness in parameter inference by modelling the likelihood through an Edgeworth expansion which involves the complete skewness tensor, composed of 1-point, 2-point, and 3-point correlators. To simplify the calculations of this expansion we perform a change of basis which reduces the precision matrix to the identity. In this basis, the off-diagonal elements of the skewness tensor are consistent with zero, while the amplitude of its diagonal match the level expected for a Gaussian underlying field. We perform parameter inference with this likelihood model and find that including only the diagonal part of the skewness is sufficient, while incorporating the full skewness tensor injects noise without improving accuracy. Despite the estimated excess skewness in the original basis, the cosmological constraints remain effectively unchanged when adopting a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
