Goodstein at the Second Threshold: An Independence Result for $ID_2$
Oriola Gjetaj, Andreas Weiermann

TL;DR
This paper introduces a generalized Goodstein process based on the Hardy hierarchy, proving that the theory of non-iterated positive inductive definitions for two operators ($ID_2$) cannot prove its termination, establishing a new independence result.
Contribution
It extends Goodstein principles to the Hardy hierarchy and demonstrates their unprovability in $ID_2$, reaching beyond the Bachmann-Howard level.
Findings
The new Goodstein process terminates unprovably in $ID_2$.
Develops an ordinal notation system with a two-step collapsing procedure.
Establishes a new independence result at the second proof-theoretic threshold.
Abstract
The classical Goodstein process, defined via hereditary base- exponential normal form, is a well-known example of a principle unprovable in Peano Arithmetic. In this paper, we generalize this framework by constructing a new Goodstein process based on the Hardy hierarchy. We develop an ordinal notation system utilizing a two-step collapsing procedure, which yields a proof-theoretic ordinal of . By defining -normal forms for natural numbers within this system, we introduce a Goodstein-type process and demonstrate that the theory of non-iterated positive inductive definitions for two operators () cannot prove its termination. This result establishes a new independence result at the second proof-theoretic threshold, further extending the reach of Goodstein-type principles beyond the Bachmann-Howard level.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
