Ontology-Constrained Neural Reasoning in Enterprise Agentic Systems: A Neurosymbolic Architecture for Domain-Grounded AI Agents
Thanh Luong Tuan, Abhijit Sanyal

TL;DR
This paper introduces a neurosymbolic architecture with ontology grounding for enterprise AI agents, significantly improving reasoning accuracy and consistency across multiple LLMs and domains.
Contribution
It presents a formal three-layer ontology model, neurosymbolic coupling taxonomy, and empirical validation demonstrating the effectiveness of ontology grounding in enterprise AI.
Findings
Ontology-coupled agents outperform ungrounded agents on accuracy and role consistency (p < .001).
Ontology lift is 2x greater in Vietnam-localized domains compared to English domains.
Ontology grounding's value is inversely related to LLM training data coverage.
Abstract
Enterprise adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) is constrained by hallucination, domain drift, and the inability to enforce regulatory compliance at the reasoning level. We present a neurosymbolic architecture implemented within the Foundation AgenticOS (FAOS) platform that addresses these limitations through ontology-constrained neural reasoning. We introduce a three-layer ontological framework--Role, Domain, and Interaction ontologies--grounding LLM-based enterprise agents. We formalize asymmetric neurosymbolic coupling: current enterprise systems constrain agent inputs (context assembly, tool discovery, governance thresholds) but not outputs, and we propose mechanisms extending this coupling to output-side validation (response checking, reasoning verification, compliance enforcement). A controlled experiment (1,800 runs across five industries and three LLMs: Claude Sonnet 4, Qwen…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
