Do Agents Repair When Challenged -- or Just Reply? Challenge, Repair, and Public Correction in a Deployed Agent Forum
Luyang Zhang, Yi-Yun Chu, Jialu Wang, Beibei Li, Ramayya Krishnan

TL;DR
This study compares a deployed LLM agent forum with Reddit, revealing that sustained challenge, repair, and correction are rare in the agent forum, impacting social alignment and safety.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence that community engagement processes like challenge and repair are significantly less frequent in deployed agent forums compared to Reddit.
Findings
Agent forum discussions are ten times less threaded than Reddit.
Original authors rarely respond to challenges in the agent forum.
No repairs are observed under a conservative protocol in the agent forum.
Abstract
As large language model (LLM) agents are deployed in public interactive settings, a key question is whether their communities can sustain challenge, repair, and public correction, or merely produce norm-like language. We compare Moltbook, a live deployed agent forum, with five matched Reddit communities by tracing a three-step mechanism: whether discussions create threaded exchange, whether challenges elicit a response, and whether correction becomes visible to the wider thread. Relative to Reddit, Moltbook discussions are roughly ten times less threaded, leaving far fewer chances for challenge and response. When challenges do occur, the original author almost never returns (1.2% vs. 40.9% on Reddit), multi-turn continuation is nearly absent (0.1% vs. 38.5%), and we detect no repairs under a shared conservative protocol. A non-challenge baseline within Reddit suggests this gap is linked…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
