Evaluation of neuroCombat and deep learning harmonization for multi-site magnetic resonance neuroimaging in youth with prenatal alcohol exposure
Chloe Scholten, Elyssa M. McMaster, Adam M. Saunders, Michael E. Kim, Gaurav Rudravaram, Elias Levy, Bryce Geeraert, Lianrui Zuo, Simon Vandekar, Catherine Lebel, and Bennett A. Landman

TL;DR
This study compares deep learning and statistical harmonization methods for multi-site pediatric neuroimaging data affected by scanner variability, focusing on prenatal alcohol exposure.
Contribution
It validates HACA3, a deep learning harmonization method, in a pediatric cohort and compares its effectiveness to neuroCombat in reducing site-related variance.
Findings
HACA3 improves inter-site contrast visually.
neuroCombat reduces more site-related variance statistically.
HACA3 benefits from follow-up statistical methods for optimal biological signal preservation.
Abstract
In cases of prevalent diseases and disorders, such as Prenatal Alcohol Exposure (PAE), multi-site data collection allows for increased study samples. However, multi-site studies introduce additional variability through heterogeneous collection materials, such as scanner and acquisition protocols, which confound with biologically relevant signals. Neuroscientists often utilize statistical methods on image-derived metrics, such as volume of regions of interest, after all image processing to minimize site-related variance. HACA3, a deep learning harmonization method, offers an opportunity to harmonize image signals prior to metric quantification; however, HACA3 has not yet been validated in a pediatric cohort. In this work, we investigate HACA3's ability to remove site-related variance and preserve biologically relevant signal compared to a statistical method, neuroCombat, and pair HACA3…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
