Propagation-mediated amplification of \{11\={2}0\}-biased inversion domain boundary alignment in polarity-mixed GaN lateral overgrowth
Harim Song, Donghoi Kim, Chinkyo Kim

TL;DR
This study investigates how 1120-biased inversion domain boundaries in GaN lateral overgrowth become increasingly aligned through propagation, revealing a propagation-mediated amplification mechanism in a mixed-polarity regime.
Contribution
It demonstrates that IDB alignment bias in mixed-polarity GaN overgrowth is amplified during propagation, contrasting with boundary-imposed selection in single-polarity cases.
Findings
IDB orientations remain biased toward 1120 family in mixed-polarity regimes.
Alignment bias is progressively amplified with propagation distance.
Propagation simulations reproduce the observed radial amplification.
Abstract
GaN polarity inversion and the associated inversion domain boundaries (IDBs) are frequently observed during lateral overgrowth and are often discussed in terms of the small energetic spread among competing IDB structures predicted by first-principles calculations. In circular mask openings, \(\{11\bar{2}0\}\)-aligned IDBs have previously been explained by geometric closure of a single-polarity hexagonal domain at the circular boundary. Here we examine an experimentally distinct regime in which opposite-polarity domains already coexist within the opening before the later development of long, straight IDB traces. In this mixed-polarity regime, the final trace orientation cannot be attributed solely to the macroscopic circular boundary. Nevertheless, plan-view SEM line-trace statistics show that IDB orientations remain biased toward the \(\{11\bar{2}0\}\) family. To quantify how this bias…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
