Distinct transverse-response signatures of retained-spin, eliminated-spin, and polynomial Burnett-type surrogate closures

TL;DR

This paper compares different microscopic and macroscopic models of incompressible flows, showing how transverse response signatures can distinguish retained-spin, eliminated-spin, and polynomial Burnett-type closures.

Contribution

It introduces a method to differentiate flow closure mechanisms using transverse linear response signatures and compares four closure models in this context.

Findings

Retained-spin theory reduces to a one-field model with a rational $k$-dependent kernel.

Finite polynomial truncations fail qualitatively, with over-damping or instabilities.

Simulations show measurable differences in spin-to-vorticity phase lag and response, discriminating between models.

Abstract

High-curvature observables in incompressible flows, including $k^4$-weighted spectra, can arise from explicit internal rotation, elimination of a fast spin variable, or polynomial higher-gradient closure. Building on a retained-spin micropolar closure derived separately from the Boltzmann--Curtiss equation, we show that these mechanisms are dynamically distinguishable in transverse linear response. In a fast-spin regime the retained-spin theory reduces to a one-field model with a rational $k$-dependent kernel whose low-$k$ expansion generates $k^4$ and $k^6$ terms, while preserving the large-$k$ roll-off of the eliminated degree of freedom. We compare four closures: incompressible Navier--Stokes, a polynomial Burnett-type surrogate, the explicit-spin micropolar theory, and the eliminated-spin rational-kernel theory. The explicit-spin theory has two poles, the eliminated-spin theory retains only the slow pole, and finite polynomial truncations fail qualitatively: a strict $k^4$ truncation becomes over-damped, while a matched $k^6$ truncation develops near-critical amplification and finite-$k$ instability. Many-particle event-driven simulations of perfectly rough spheres show that these observables are measurable and, in targeted campaigns, discriminating at the microscopic level: fixed-$k$ and multi-$k$ harmonic forcing resolve a finite spin-to-vorticity phase lag that strongly favors retained-spin dynamics over instantaneous adiabatic elimination, while the stronger-drive multi-$k$ vorticity response rejects a pure $k^2$ closure and favors the rational eliminated-spin kernel over a polynomial surrogate. Transverse response thus provides a practical diagnostic for separating retained rotational microphysics, eliminated-spin effective dynamics, and ordinary polynomial higher-gradient closures.