TL;DR
This paper introduces YARN, a modular framework that enhances narrative analogical reasoning by using LLM-derived abstractions to improve structural mapping and understanding of stories.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel framework that leverages LLMs to decompose and abstract narratives, significantly improving analogical reasoning performance over baseline models.
Findings
Abstractions improve model performance in narrative reasoning.
YARN outperforms end-to-end LLM baselines in experiments.
Error analysis highlights challenges in abstraction levels and implicit causality.
Abstract
Analogical reasoning is a key driver of human generalization in problem-solving and argumentation. Yet, analogies between narrative structures remain challenging for machines. Cognitive engines for structural mapping are not directly applicable, as they assume pre-extracted entities, whereas LLMs' performance is sensitive to prompt format and the degree of surface similarity between narratives. This gap motivates a key question: What is the impact of enhancing structural mapping with LLM-derived abstractions on their analogical reasoning ability in narratives? To that end, we propose a modular framework named YARN (Yielding Abstractions for Reasoning in Narratives), which uses LLMs to decompose narratives into units, abstract these units, and then passes them to a mapping component that aligns elements across stories to perform analogical reasoning. We define and operationalize four…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
